Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane

Ian J Russell, P Kevin Legan, Victoria A Lukashkina, Andrei N Lukashkin, Richard J Goodyear &
Guy P Richardson

Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2): 215-23

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.

Abstract:

Frequency tuning in the cochlea is determined by the passive mechanical properties of the basilar membrane and active feedback from the outer hair cells, sensory-effector cells that detect and amplify sound-induced basilar membrane motions. The sensory hair bundles of the outer hair cells are imbedded in the tectorial membrane, a sheet of extracellular matrix that overlies the cochlea's sensory epithelium. The tectorial membrane contains radially organized collagen fibrils that are imbedded in an unusual striated-sheet matrix formed by two glycoproteins, alpha-tectorin (Tecta) and beta-tectorin (Tectb). In Tectb(-/-) mice the structure of the striated-sheet matrix is disrupted. Although these mice have a low-frequency hearing loss, basilar-membrane and neural tuning are both significantly enhanced in the high-frequency regions of the cochlea, with little loss in sensitivity. These findings can be attributed to a reduction in the acting mass of the tectorial membrane and reveal a new function for this structure in controlling interactions along the cochlea. (Bold text emphasis by Martin Braun)

Comment:

Experiments during the past two decades have confirmed two functions of the tectorial membrane (TM) in the mammalian inner ear. 1) It provides a tight hydromechanical coupling between outer and inner hair cells (OHC & IHC) via the narrow subtectorial space. 2) It absorbs acoustical energy due to mechanical resonances.
Russell et al. could now for the first time separate these two functions by comprehensive anatomical and physiological investigations of gene deletion animals. In Tectb(-/-) mice the first function is fully intact, but the second function is disrupted due to a pathologic internal structure of the TM.
Hearing sensitivity above 20 kHz remained unaffected, apparently due to the unchanged OHC-IHC coupling. Frequency selectivity, however, was improved. This outcome is surprising. It could hardly be expected that a pathology would improve a key function in hearing. Why then - one may wonder - did this mutation (or a similar one) not become established in the gene pool a long time ago? It seems that during evolution a further sharpening of frequency selectivity was of less value than dispersion of acoustic energy via TM resonances. The latter reduces the risk of damages at high sound levels.

Of most importance for future research may be the following findings from Tectb(-/-) mice: a perfect symmetry of tuning curves (Figs. 4c and 5abc) and a total absence of a tail in the neural tuning curves (Figs. 5abc). Both facts impressively demonstrate a discrete, point-like, local tuning within the organ of Corti. Thus they further strengthen the well-known hypothesis that the OHCs are tuned amplifiers. (Comment Martin Braun)

NOM Home

    Free counter and web stats