Absolute Pitch and Planum Temporale

Julian Paul Keenan*, Ven Thangaraj*, Andrea R. Halpern‡, Gottfried Schlaug*

NeuroImage Vol. 14, No. 6, December 1, 2001, pp. 1402-1408

*Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
‡Department of Psychology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, 17837

Abstract:

An increased leftward asymmetry of the planum temporale (PT) in absolute-pitch (AP) musicians has been previously reported, with speculation that early exposure to music influences the degree of PT asymmetry. To test this hypothesis and to determine whether a larger left PT or a smaller right PT actually accounts for the increased overall PT asymmetry in AP musicians, anatomical magnetic resonance images were taken from a right-handed group of 27 AP musicians, 27 nonmusicians, and 22 non-AP musicians. A significantly greater leftward PT asymmetry and a significantly smaller right absolute PT size for the AP musicians compared to the two control groups was found, while the left PT was only marginally larger in the AP group. The absolute size of the right PT and not the left PT was a better predictor of music group membership, possibly indicating "pruning" of the right PT rather than expansion of the left underlying the increased PT asymmetry in AP musicians. Although early exposure to music may be a prerequisite for acquiring AP, the increased PT asymmetry in AP musicians may be determined in utero, implicating possible genetic influences on PT asymmetry. This may explain why the increased PT asymmetry of AP musicians was not seen in the group of early beginning non-AP musicians.
(Bold text emphasis by Martin Braun)

Comment:

This is the first report of anatomical evidence that subjects with absolute pitch (APers) may have something less than non-APers. The planum temporale (PT) is a small part of the neocortex that contributes to language processing and to general auditory processing. The right PT has now been found to be significantly smaller in APers than in control groups. Interestingly, an anatomical deficit in APers could indeed be expected, based on the assumption hat the propensity to develop AP during childhood may be a by-effect of a harmless developmental disorder. Due to such a (slight) disorder, some children may have difficulties in doing the normal step from implicit AP at birth to implicit relative pitch (RP) when learning their first language. Implicit RP helps understanding the speech intonation of speakers other than the mother. So, while still struggling with acquiring implicit RP, these children may - if there is a musical environment - extend their implicit AP to explicit AP. From a neuroanatomical point of view, AP clearly is an easier task than RP. This is simply due to the tonotopic neural wiring throughout the auditory brain. For AP one only needs a certain memory connection. For RP, however, one needs a computation that compares pitch intervals across different spectral ranges, and thus across different neural map sections. Many have wondered why not all have explicit AP. The likely answer is that RP is of more use than AP in speech. A deficit in the right PT may impede the development of implicit RP, and then, by triggering a compensatory measure, lead to the development of explicit AP.
(Comment Martin Braun)

AP in speech

NOM Home