Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones

Donal G. Sinex, Jennifer Henderson Sabes, and Hongzhe Li

Hearing Research, Volume 168, Issues 1-2, June 2002, Pages 150-162

Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Box 871908, Tempe, AZ 85287-1908, USA

Abstract:

Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to simplified stimuli that may engage mechanisms that contribute to auditory scene analysis were obtained. The stimuli were harmonic complex tones, which are heard by human listeners as single sounds, and the same tones with one component 'mistuned', which are heard as two separate sounds. The temporal discharge pattern elicited by a harmonic complex tone usually resembled the same neuron's response to a pure tone. In contrast, tones with a mistuned component elicited responses with distinctive, stereotypical temporal patterns that were not obviously related to the stimulus waveform. For a particular stimulus configuration, the discharge pattern was similar across neurons with different pure-tone frequency selectivity. A computational model that compared response envelopes across multiple narrow bands successfully reproduced the stereotypical response patterns elicited by different stimulus configurations. The results suggest that mistuning created a temporally synchronous distributed representation of the mistuned component that could be identified by higher auditory centers in the presence of the ongoing response produced by the remaining components; this kind of representation might facilitate the identification of individual sound sources in complex acoustic environments.
(Bold text emphasis by Martin Braun)

Comment:

This paper reports a major breakthrough in the research of consonance and dissonance. Consonance has two components, musical consonance and sensory consonance. The former is dependent on musical habits, but the latter is dependent on the physiology of the auditory system. In 1863 Helmholtz suggested that sensory dissonance results from a perception of roughness, which is due to beat frequencies produced by interacting spectral components (partials, harmonics). This theory was confirmed and extended in the 1960s by Plomp and others on the basis of psychoacoustic experiments. Until now it was uncertain, however, if and where the beat frequencies that underlie the roughness in sensory dissonance are represented in the auditory brain. Sinex, Henderson, and Li could now record the exact beat frequencies in single neurons of the auditory midbrain, i.e., the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus, in the chinchilla. For example, the sound components at 1120 Hz and 1250 Hz caused a frequency component of 130 Hz in the firing response of these neurons, thus exactly mirroring the acoustical beat frequency. It is interesting that similar "neuronal beats" are less clear in the first neurons that leave the inner ear, and in the auditory cortex they do not occur in single neurons at all. The current theory is that temporal information from separate, frequency-band-specific, neuronal channels is combined in the auditory midbrain, resulting in strong and clear neuronal beats there. Above this nucleus, however, the temporal information is no longer conserved, but transformed to other codes in many specialized upward neurons. Some of them apparently register the occurrence of beats in the midbrain and then contribute to the perception of roughness and dissonance.
(Comment Martin Braun)

NOM Home